Tag: FAQs

Our attention has been drawn to false media reports alleging that Sahara Energy owes outstanding remittances to the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB).

 Please see links below:

 https://oracleintelligence.com.ng/2025/12/02/ncf-debts-ncdmb-nass-chase-sahara-energy-others/

 BREAKING: Sahara Group failed to contribute to NCD fund since 2015 – Senate – The Trumpet Newspaper Nigeria

 Sahara categorically refutes these allegations. The claims made in the publications are inaccurate, misleading, and do not reflect the true status of Sahara’s obligations, engagements, or relationship with the NCDMB.

 As a responsible corporate organisation, Sahara Energy maintains the highest standards of regulatory compliance and corporate governance. We have consistently fulfilled our statutory obligations and continue to engage transparently with all relevant regulatory authorities, including the NCDMB, in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and industry best practices.

 Following a routine annual reconciliation between Sahara and the NCDMB on May 6, 2026, the NCDMB confirmed receipt of remittances made by Sahara up till 2025. It is important to note that matters relating to regulatory assessments, reconciliations, or routine engagements with government agencies are often subject to ongoing reviews and established administrative processes.

 Sahara has consistently remitted its contributions on all assets operated by Sahara, in line with the provisions of the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development (NOGICD) Act.

 Beyond compliance, Sahara Group remains a critical stakeholder committed to working with NCDMB to achieve the all-important goal of optimising local content capacity.

 We urge the public to ignore false reports in their entirety.

 Sahara will continue to invest in local content development to ensure shared prosperity across the energy value chain in Nigeria and across the continent.

Our attention has been drawn to misleading publications and commentaries regarding certain power sector financing arrangements and related disputes.

Please see links below:

https://www.billionaires.africa/2025/08/10/court-backs-fbnquest-trustees-in-move-to-seize-energy-assets-linked-to-tope-shonubi/

Court Backs Fbnquest Trustees In Move To Seize Energy Assets Linked To Tope Shonubi

Court backs FBNQuest Trustees in move to seize energy assets linked to Tope Shonubi with rahim66 – rahim6 news

 

We wish to state, for the record, that these publications are a gross misrepresentation of the facts and a rehash of issues that are already the subject of ongoing judicial proceedings.

Sahara Power Group and its affiliated entities remain compliant with all legal and regulatory requirements and continue to operate in the normal course of business.

We affirm unequivocally that the relevant entities and operating companies are neither in receivership nor being managed by any external party whatsoever.

For clarity, the matters in dispute are currently before competent courts, and all parties have submitted to the jurisdiction of the courts for determination. Sahara has consistently relied on the verifiable facts of the matter and has taken all necessary legal steps to protect its interests in accordance with due process.

We reiterate that the Federal High Court in Lagos, in its rulings, expressly restrained the Lenders and their purported Receiver/Manager from taking any adverse actions against the businesses, assets, and undertakings of the affected entities. These orders remain valid, binding, and fully enforceable.

Please see link to the orders below:

https://www.sahara-group.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/COMPOSITE-RULING-KEPCO-ENERGY-RESOURCES-NIG-LTD.-V.-ECOBANK-NIGERIA-LTD.-.pdf

Furthermore, following the appeals filed by the syndicate of Lenders against the Federal High Court rulings, the Court of Appeal on 13 April 2026 dismissed all the appeals, affirmed the subsisting restraining orders, and referred the matters back to the Federal High Court for accelerated hearing. This reaffirms the correctness of our position.

 

Please see link to the orders below:

https://www.sahara-group.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/JUDGMENT-ACCESS-BANK-PLC-ORS-V.-NG-POWER-HPS-LTD.pdf

https://www.sahara-group.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/JUDGMENT-ECOBANK-LTD-ORS-V.-KEPCO-ENERGY-RESOURCES-NIG-LTD.pdf

https://www.sahara-group.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/JUDGMENT-ECOBANK-LTD-ORS-V.-NEDC-LTD.pdf

 

We also note, in line with our previous statement, that attempts to distort the facts through media publications or other channels do not alter the clear legal position as established by the courts, and such actions should be disregarded.

Please see link to our statement:

Sahara Power Group Entities (Egbin Power Plc, First Independent Power Limited & Ikeja Electric Plc) are not in receivership – Sahara Group

We therefore urge the public, stakeholders, and the media to disregard misleading commentary on matters that are sub judice.

Sahara remains resolute and confident in the strength of its position, while maintaining its commitment to responsible operations and value creation within the Nigerian power sector.

  https://www.sahara-group.com/2025/08/26/sahara-power-group-entities-egbin-power-plc-first-independent-power-limited-ikeja-electric-plc-are-not-in-receivership/

Our attention has been drawn to false and misleading advertorials in This Day Newspapers of August 6, 2025, and accompanying reports sourced from same, alleging the appointment of ‘Kunle Ogunba Esq. SAN as Receiver/Manager by FBNQuest Trustees Limited acting for a syndicate of Lenders) over the entire undertakings, assets, etc, of the following Sahara Power Group Limited affiliates:  KEPCO Energy Resource Nigeria Limited, Ng-Power-HPS Limited, and New Electricity Distribution Company Limited (“the Power Entities”).

Please see links to some stories sourced from the said publication:

https://thewillnews.com/ikeja-electric-goes-into-receivership/

Confusion over Ikeja DisCo, Egbin Power takeover, as CPPE seeks Nigerian Govt’s intervention – Daily Post Nigeria

We would like to state for the record that the said publications are not only a gross misrepresentation of facts, but a rehash of previous reports aimed at damaging our goodwill and reputation, which has made the Sahara Brand a foremost energy conglomerate for almost three decades.

We affirm unequivocally that the Power Entities, as well as the operating companies (Egbin Power Plc, Ikeja Electric Plc, and First Independent Power Co. Limited), are neither in Receivership nor being managed by any external party whatsoever.

We would like to state categorically, and for the record, that Justice Akintayo Aluko of the Federal High Court in Lagos, in Rulings delivered in Suit Nos. FHC/L/CS/1242, FHC/L/CS/1244, and FHC/L/CS/1245 on 5th August 2025 restrained the Lenders and their purported Receiver/Manager from:

1. Calling or accelerating the facility granted by the Lenders to the Power Entities which has not matured or are in default
2. Interfering and/or continuing to interfere, or taking steps to interfere with the assets, businesses, and undertakings of the Power Entities in any manner whatsoever; or taking any adverse steps under any guise, whether by way of suspension of the business and operational accounts of the Power Entities and its shareholders domiciled with the Defendants or in any manner whatsoever.
3. Enforcing or taking any steps to enforce any share security granted over the assets of the Power Entities or their sponsors based on the disputed debt claimed by the Lenders, which the Power Entities vehemently dispute.
4. Unilaterally enforcing or taking any steps to enforce or take any steps to enforce of take any action under any finance document in connection with the disputed debt.

In addition, the Power Entities have since published rejoinders and duly certified enrolled judgements which portray the unassailable facts of the matter.

Please click below for details:

Rejoinder-Ogunbas-False-Publication 

Rejoinder to Ogunba’s Publication of August 8 2025 -ThisDay  )

Please see links below:

https://www.thisdaylive.com/2025/08/07/egbin-power-ikeja-electric-fipl-not-in-receivership-says-management/

Egbin, Ikeja Electric, FIPL not in receivership – Management

Egbin Power, Ikeja Electric, First Independent Power not in receivership – Management – Businessday NG

‘Egbin Power Plc, Ikeja Electric, FIPL Not In Receivership’

We urge the public and our stakeholders to ignore the false advertorials and syndicated press releases in their entirety.  The matters in dispute amongst the Parties are currently the subject of litigation in various suits where the Lenders have submitted to the jurisdiction of the Courts.

We remain committed to our contributions to the growth and development of the Nigerian Power Sector as a foremost stakeholder, responsibly transforming power supply across the Nation.

Our attention has been drawn to a misleading publication on www.foreignaffairs.co.nz alleging the supply of Jet A1 to the military in Myanmar by Sahara Energy International Pte. Ltd (SIL).

The said article, which indicated that its submissions were purportedly sourced from Amnesty International is utterly unfounded and false.Please see link below to the article with headline: MIL-OSI Submissions: Myanmar: ‘Reckless’ shipments of jet fuel continue as air strikes multiply – Amnesty International

https://foreignaffairs.co.nz/2024/07/08/mil-osi-submissions-myanmar-reckless-shipments-of-jet-fuel-continue-as-air-strikes-multiply-amnesty-international/#

Sahara Energy would like to state for the record that we have at no time, directly or indirectly supplied Jet A1 to the military in Myanmar as falsely claimed in the story. Contrary to claims of “new deliveries” of Jet A1 by Sahara Energy to Myanmar in the article, the last supply of Jet A1 to Myanmar by SIL was in August 2022.
The last three supplies by SIL were made directly to Trafigura’s local trading arm in Myanmar, namely NEPAS- National Energy PUMA Aviation Services Ltd.

 Since then,  SIL made a business decision after the last delivery made in August 2022 to stop further deliveries of Jet A1 and all Petroleum Products into Myanmar following official sanctions against the Government of Myanmar.

We affirm that SIL has not had any direct or indirect dealings with the Civil Aviation, Military authorities, or any Trading Company (after the last delivery in Aug 2022) in Myanmar.

In addition, at no point in time in the last 6 years did SIL Charter the HUITONG78 vessel to deliver Jet A1 or any other petroleum product either directly or indirectly into Myanmar as incorrectly stated in the article.

We find it disingenuous and libellous that the authors of the said article are leaning on the reputation of Amnesty International to propagate their bogus claims. However, even if the purported claims were sourced from Amnesty International, a thorough investigation (which is the hallmark of credible media organisations) would have revealed the facts of the matter. The publication is at best, a fabrication that runs contrary to the ideals of good journalism.

Sahara hereby advises the public, our stakeholders, and partners to disregard these false reports and their variants which are being rehashed and syndicated in various news portals.

Sahara’s operations and processes are driven by business integrity and good governance as advocated by the World Economic Forum.

We remain committed to transparency, a critical value proposition that propels the success of the Sahara Brand as we continue to bring energy to life responsibly.

Our attention has been drawn to a misleading media report alleging payment of bribes of over 300 million USD by Sahara Energy International in respect of the acquisition of Oil Mining Licence (OML11).

Continue reading

Our attention has been drawn to several misleading media reports and apparently sponsored false commentary on the ongoing contract between Sahara Energy and Société Nationale de Petroles (SONAP) for the supply of petroleum products to the Republic of Guinea.

Please find some links below to the said publications:

https://sunupetrole.com/blog/2024/01/17/dans-lombre-de-doumbouya-le-deal-petrolier-avec-sahara-group-au-coeur-dune-lutte-des-clans/

https://www.jeuneafrique.com/1526374/economie-entreprises/dans-lombre-de-doumbouya-le-deal-petrolier-avec-sahara-group-au-coeur-dune-lutte-des-clans/

https://africacenter.org/spotlight/stagnant-transition-guinea/

Sahara Energy would like to state for the record that these reports are a rehash of previously published articles on the subject which have been making the rounds since Q4 2023.
The allegations cited in the articles are unsubstantiated and concocted in a manner that shows a total lack of journalistic acumen and veracity.

We also state for the record that the products supply referred to in the articles, were supplied subsequent to an open tender conducted by SONAP in which Sahara emerged as the preferred supplier based on the results of the tender.

The tender was necessitated in response to market disruptions occasioned by the Russia-Ukraine war.

We also note the following important series of events that surrounded the bidding process as they help to put the events into the right context.

• SONAP organized the Tender originally on the 25th of February 2022, the companies who participated in the tender were Sahara Energy, Addax and Mocho Energy. Following the transparent and competitive bidding process, Sahara Energy emerged as the winner and received a notification of award on the 4th March 2022

Consequently, the importation contract was signed on the 11th March 2022

• Following the Russia-Ukraine War induced disruptions in-excess of what was predicted, an ad-hoc meeting was convened to discuss the impact of the war on supply of products to Guinea.
• The meeting had major local distributors and marketing companies in attendance
• It is important to note that at this time, even the traders managing the existing contracts had declared a force majeure due to the supply and pricing disruptions as a result of the war
• This force majeure declaration led to SONAP purchasing spot cargoes at prices marginally higher than the tender price to ensure there were no product shortages in the country
• Demond, Total, Vitol and Sahara Energy all participated in the spot purchase arrangements
• In response to the further heightened geo-political tension generated by the war as it progressed and the UN started considering sanctions, SONAP approved further increase in prices in supply contracts as the prices agreed to in the contracts was no longer realistic given the volatility in the market.
• This was done to ensure continued access to products in the country
• Following the above, the first supply price amendment was approved for 6 months by SONAP on 8 April, 2022
• On the 20th September 2022 the second amendment was approved for a further 6 month period
• On the 20th April 2023 a the third amendment was approved for a further 1 month period.
• One month later, the fourth amendment was signed with the price negotiated downwards to $90 per tonne.
• This price was below the original awarded tender price before the force majeure was declared due to market conditions.
• This reduced was possible due to the global commodity market supply and prices stabilizing after the first year of the war as the market adjusted to the effective loss of volumes that had previously originated in Russia and refineries across the world were able to make the necessary adjustments to take up the fall in supply.
• These interim spot awards that were done to avoid stock outs in the country were supplied by a multitude of traders including but not limited to Demond, Total, Vitol and Sahara Energy

The above clearly shows the transparent trajectory of the product supply transactions, and how at every turn, the professional team at SONAP were able to react to the market dynamics with all stakeholders working in the best interest of the good people of Guinea ensuring there were no stock outs of products.

The online publications referenced above also claimed that the DG of SONAP, Amadou Doumbouya was allegedly able to purchase properties in the US at around the same time of the tender award.

We are unable to respond to this as we have no knowledge of the personal circumstances of Mr. Doumbouya or indeed the veracity of the insinuations of the allegations in the article which appear to be pure speculation and can only unfortunately be described as baseless reckless insinuations.

The Sahara Group has built a formidable global brand over the past 27 years, Sahara Energy is delighted to be a stakeholder in the oil and gas sector in Guinea since 2017.

Over this period, our focus has been an unwavering desire to ‘Bring Energy To The Lives’ of the good people Guinea responsibly through transparent, professional, and credible energy solutions.We will continue to deliver on this privilege to serve, working alongside SONAP in conjunction with the regulatory agencies and stakeholders in the sector.

We urge all our partners and stakeholders to disregard these false reports in their entirety.

Our attention has been drawn to media reports indicating a bench warrant issued against Mr. Rotimi Amaechi, Mr. Tonye Cole and others, for their alleged failure to appear in court in respect of a criminal charge filed by the Rivers State Government (“RSG”) regarding misappropriation of funds during the tenure of former Governor Amaechi from 2007 to 2015.

Please see below links to some of such past publications regarding the said criminal charges:

$50m fraud: Rivers State begins prosecution of Amaechi, slam 9 count charge against him, Cole, others – The Street Journal.

 

https://sundiatapost.com/rivers-state-initiates-criminal-trial-of-amaechi-and-cole-over-alleged-theft-of-53-1m/

https://barristerng.com/rivers-govt-initiates-criminal-trial-of-amaechi-and-cole/

https://nigerianbulletin.com/threads/rivers-state-initiates-criminal-trial-of-amaechi-and-cole-over-alleged-theft-of-53-1m-the-nation.469454/

 

Again, we affirm for the record that the allegations leading to the said criminal charges and reports are utterly false and a rehash of previously syndicated stories which remain unsubstantiated.

We note from the reports that the allegations in the purported suit are similar to previous baseless and politically motivated assertions following the strained relationship between two previous governors of Rivers State (including the immediate past governor), which dates back to the time of the alleged sale of Rivers State asset.

We recall that the RSG was reported to have withdrawn a previous suit on the issue. Please see links below:

 

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2022/10/rivers-withdraws-criminal-charges-against-amaechi-apc-gov-candidate-cole/amp/?utm_medium=break.ma&utm_source=break.ma

https://leadership.ng/assets-sale-rivers-govt-withdraws-criminal-charges-against-amaechi-cole-2/

https://thenationonlineng.net/rivers-withdraws-criminal-charges-against-amaechi-cole-others/

 

Following the ruling of His Lordship Hon. Justice. Nwogu of the Rivers State High Court, Port Harcourt on 17th of May 2023, as well the arrest warrant issued by the same court, an appeal was instituted at the Court of Appeal, Port Harcourt, Rivers State.

The appeal came up on the 20th of June 2023 for ruling and a decision was given in favour of the appellants. In summary, the Court of Appeal set aside the ruling of the Rivers State High Court thereby quashing the arrest warrant earlier issued. The Court of Appeal also set aside the entire proceedings conducted on 17^th May, 2023.

Please see the link to the publication affirming our position. https://www.channelstv.com/2023/06/20/appeal-court-sets-aside-warrant-of-arrest-against-amaechi-others/

The link to the judgement can be accessed here.

 

The above reinforces our position and previous clarifications that the allegations leading to the aforestated criminal charge are patently false and an apparent political spectacle that should be disregarded.

Please see links below for previous statements made by Sahara on the issue.

https://www.sahara-group.com/2022/05/28/sahara-group-clarifies-misleading-media-reports-on-rivers-state-power-assets/

https://www.sahara-group.com/2022/06/20/update-on-misleading-media-reports-on-rivers-state-power-assets/

https://www.sahara-group.com/2022/10/17/rivers-state-power-assets/

Sahara Group reiterates its commitment to integrity, corporate governance, and transparency in our operations. These values continue to drive the success of the Sahara Brand for over 25 years in keeping with global best practices and bringing energy to life responsibly.

Sahara Group’s operations and processes are driven by business integrity and good governance as advocated by the World Economic Forum.

We remain committed to transparency, a critical value proposition that propels the success of the Sahara Brand as we continue to bring energy to life responsibly.

Our attention has been drawn to a misleading and unfounded article published by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) alleging the involvement of Sahara Energy in questionable transactions in South Sudan.

Please see link below:

Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project – OCCRP

Sahara Group and Sahara Energy would like to state for the record that the article is utterly false and fabricated as Sahara Energy has never been involved with any of the mentioned companies, including but not limited to Chiang Wei Ltd, BB Energy, and Glencore in South Sudan.

We further affirm that we neither have any business relationship nor association with any of these entities.

We also unequivocally state that we have never paid any facilitation or arrangement fees to any individual or organisation for enabling prepayment agreements as described in the article.

This allegation in completely baseless and at variance with our unwavering dedication to the ideals of transparency and integrity in business as evidenced by our collaboration with the World Economic Forum’s Partnering Against Corruption Initiative (PACI).

Sahara Energy remains active on the African continent where it commenced business operations in 1996 and expanded its Eastern African footprint to the Republic South Sudan in 2018.

Sahara continues to trade with South Sudan under the mandate of the Ministry of Petroleum and Ministry of Finance & Planning. At the request of the Ministry, Sahara has offered various customary payment instruments including a credit facility for Crude Oil back stopped by a sovereign guarantee from the Bank of South Sudan.

Sahara undertakes its business in South Sudan transparently and participated in full cooperation/compliance of an inquiry by the United Nations Panel of Experts appointed to monitor the extraction and trade of the Government of South in 2018 and 2020.

Sahara Energy was not found wanting in any aspect of its operations in South Sudan by the UN instituted panel of inquiry.

For over 26 years, Sahara has consistently operated as a foremost energy conglomerate committed to bringing energy to life responsibly.. We are proud of what we have achieved and continue to work with regional and global institutions to advance the frontiers of access to energy and sustainable development in Africa.